Website design by No Bad Slides, 2016

  • Home

  • About

  • Services

  • Commentaries

  • Presentation Tips

  • Contact

  • More

    How to acknowledge collaborators in a meaningful way

    September 20, 2019

    Elements of an initial venture capital pitch

    May 8, 2018

    How to include financial information

    October 4, 2017

    Who is this symposium for anyway?

    May 26, 2017

    Try to engage the audience

    May 24, 2017

    Repairing a broken text slide and then converting it to a powerful visual

    April 26, 2017

    A to Z: Data gathering to presentation

    March 14, 2017

    Successful vs. Effective Presentations

    January 27, 2017

    When you think you're done, use the index card method.

    January 9, 2017

    Just shut down that second screen!

    December 22, 2016

    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!

    Please reload

    Featured Posts
    The presentation ecosystem

    Sadly, this is way too typical

    December 9, 2016

    Today I attended a major cancer center's weekly seminar.  I had never visited this center, so I was looking forward to getting a sense of the culture, even if I couldn't understand all the material related to imaging agents in glioblastoma.

     

    What I witnessed was unfortunately, not uncommon in biomedical research.  I don't mean to pick on this center, or this speaker, it's what I've seen throughout my career and at many institutions.  

     

    Although this was the regular weekly center-sponsored talk, only about 30-35 people attended.  More striking was the audience composition, which based on looking at the ages, I guess only 2 or 3 faculty attended. The rest were probably graduate students and postdocs.  Rare is the Cancer Center that really does pull faculty together (they do however look interactive in written grant proposals!).


    The presentation was also pretty typical; about 50-75 very complicated slides in 50 minutes, a thematic question buried somewhere in the talk, and little evidence that the speaker was concerned about what audience was comprehending or whether they were even listening.  Had the speaker taken a look, he would have seen audience members furiously doing emails, surfing the web.  A few were dozing

     

    After the 50 minutes, ~75 slides, AND ZERO audience interaction , the remaining faculty member (the Center Director crept out early) asked the audience if there were any questions.  There were none and about two thirds of the room starting emptying. Feeling a bit sheepish, the remaining faculty member posed a question as people continued to file out.  

     

    Again no particular criticism on this Center or this speaker.  It's way too typical.  We need to rethink how we communicate science.

     

     

    Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter
    Please reload

    Follow Us

    I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!

    Please reload

    Search By Tags

    September 2019 (1)

    May 2018 (1)

    October 2017 (1)

    May 2017 (2)

    April 2017 (1)

    March 2017 (1)

    January 2017 (2)

    December 2016 (3)

    November 2016 (1)

    September 2016 (4)

    August 2016 (41)

    Please reload

    Archive
    • Facebook Basic Square
    • Twitter Basic Square
    • Google+ Social Icon